Wapp Technologies, LLC v. Micro Focus, Inc., HP Enterprises, Inc. Represented Wapp Technologies in a jury trial that resulted in $172.5 million jury verdict of willful infringement.
OpenTV, Inc. v. NFL Enterprises, LLC. Represented OpenTV in a seven patent case involving verifying PIN codes giving users access to password-restricted websites and applications, methods of inserting content into video streams using time-code indicators, methods of allowing users to interact with videos and a method of connecting multiple video metadata sets, methods of programming software to identify if a computer does not have the right applications to run certain media, methods of combining multiple media data streams into a single broadcast stream and methods of connecting streaming videos with other websites via a link.
Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II v. Motorola Mobility (District of Delaware and Southern District of Florida) Represented Intellectual Ventures in back to back patent infringement trials in Delaware and won both trials. The asserted patents relate to technology in smart phones including sending MMS messages, power allocation and conservation and docking stations
Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture litigation (Eastern District of Texas) Represented representing a large consumer electronics company in a patent case involving memory architecture and video coding technology.
Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. litigation (Eastern District of Texas) Represented a large consumer electronics company in a patent case involving computer interface and data transfer technology.
Interval Licensing LLC. Litigation (Western District of Washington) Represented a large consumer electronics company in a patent case involving computer display technology.
DSS Technology Management, Inc. (Northern District of California) Represented a large consumer electronics company in a patent case involving Bluetooth technology.
Polaris PowerLED Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Ltd. (E.D. Texas) Represented Polaris PowerLED in a substantial patent infringement case involving automatic brightness control technology implemented in Samsung mobile phones and televisions. The case settled favorably on confidential terms on the eve of jury trial.
University of Michigan v. Leica Microsystems, Inc. (N.D. California) Currently representing University of Michigan in a patent infringement action enforcing the University’s leading edge patented microscope technology
Intellectual Ventures II v. JPMorgan et. al. (Southern District of New York) Represented representing Intellectual Ventures II in a patent infringement matter against several JPMorgan Chase entities. The asserted patent relates to a cryptographic co-processor for processing RSA or ECC algorithms.
Pragmatus AV LLC v. Yahoo! Inc. (District of Delaware) Represented Pragmatus in a five patent infringement action against Yahoo!. The case involved distributed video teleconferencing technology.
Pragmatus AV LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc. (Southern District of Florida) Represented Plaintiff Pragmatus in a four patent infringement action against Citrix. The case involved distributed video teleconferencing technology.
MicroUnity v. Palm (Eastern District of Texas) Represented Palm in a twelve patent infringement action against MicroUnity. The case involved microprocessor technology.
Xpoint v. Palm (District of Delaware) Represented Palm in a patent infringement action against Xpoint. The case involved microprocessor technology.
U.S. Philips v. Palm (Northern District of California) Represented Palm in a patent infringement action against Philips. The case involved wireless consumer devices.
EON v. Palm (District of Delaware, Eastern District of Texas) Represented Palm in two patent infringement actions against EON. The case involved wireless consumer devices.